Emma: girls named per year, 1880 to 2025
Emma: girls named per year stood at 12,754 in 2025, down 5.7% on the previous period.
12,754 American girls were named Emma in 2025. The name's recorded peak is 22,719 in 2003; the series runs from 1880.
How it is measured
The counts come from Social Security card applications, tabulated by the SSA by year of birth, name, and sex. It is administrative data, not a survey: every point is actual registrations. Two caveats shape the edges: names with fewer than five occurrences in a year are withheld for privacy, and the earliest decades undercount births because Social Security began in 1935 and older people applied late or never.
What the curve shows
Name data is one of the cleanest cultural time series in existence, and the curves behave like fashion: a rise usually has a traceable trigger, a famous namesake or a character, and the decay is slow because names linger in families after they leave the zeitgeist. Emma is at or near its recorded high, which for a name is the crest of the wave.
Does this count everyone with the name?
Why do old names look rarer than they were?
Make this chart yours.
Open it in the editor with the data already loaded. Brand it, animate it, embed it.